home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Columbia Kermit
/
kermit.zip
/
newsgroups
/
misc.20021006-20030409
/
000130_henry.thorpe@att.net_Tue Dec 3 15:07:41 EST 2002.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
2020-01-01
|
1KB
|
34 lines
Article: 13911 of comp.protocols.kermit.misc
Path: newsmaster.cc.columbia.edu!panix!newsfeed.mathworks.com!wn13feed!wn11feed!worldnet.att.net!bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net.POSTED!not-for-mail
Message-ID: <3DED0DC3.9040705@att.net>
From: "Henry E. Thorpe" <henry.thorpe@att.net>
Organization: Just me!
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.kermit.misc
Subject: Re: K95 2.1.2 faster?
References: <3DED0D88.2050905@att.net>
In-Reply-To: <3DED0D88.2050905@att.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 11
NNTP-Posting-Host: 562434e20401d30458bbf44e8ab3b28b
X-Complaints-To: abuse@worldnet.att.net
X-Trace: bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net 1038945734 562434e20401d30458bbf44e8ab3b28b (Tue, 03 Dec 2002 20:02:14 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2002 20:02:14 GMT
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2002 20:02:14 GMT
Xref: newsmaster.cc.columbia.edu comp.protocols.kermit.misc:13911
More noise. Should have been:
Is OpenSSL 0.9.7-beta4 that much better?
Henry E. Thorpe wrote:
> Is it just my imagination, or is K95 2.1.2 a whole lot faster with
> regards to SSH and TLS/SSL connections?
>
> Is 0.9.7-beta4 that much better?
>